Balancing Individual Rights and State Authority in Criminal Justice Reform: A Comparative Analysis of Procedural Fairness and Legal Accountability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/jccl.v1i3.142Keywords:
Comparative Legal Systems, Criminal Justice, Due Process of Law, Legal Accountability, Rule of LawAbstract
Background: Criminal justice reform has become a crucial global issue in maintaining the balance between the protection of individual rights and state authority, particularly amid the increasing complexity of law enforcement and the risk of abuse of power. Objective: This study aims to analyze the relationship between the principles of due process of law, legal accountability, and the rule of law within criminal justice systems, as well as to compare their implementation in common law and civil law systems. Methods: This research employs a normative and comparative approach through the analysis of legal regulations, criminal justice practices, case studies of procedural violations, and cross-country comparisons, supported by interviews with academics and legal practitioners. Results: The findings indicate that although the principles of due process, legal accountability, and the rule of law are widely recognized, their implementation still faces significant challenges, including weak oversight, procedural inconsistencies, and limited institutional capacity. The comparative analysis also reveals a growing convergence between common law and civil law systems in adopting human rights-based standards, despite differences in procedural approaches. This study concludes that the holistic integration of these three principles is essential to establish a fair, transparent, and accountable criminal justice system.
Downloads
References
Abiad, H. A., & Masadeh, A. (2024). Law Comparison as a Research Method in Legal Studies, and Its Importance in Promoting Uniformity in Legal Systems. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 473, 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56121-4_42
Aden, H., Lennon, G., Mouhanna, C., Roach, K., Johansen, A., & Uranaka, C. (2025). The Rule of Law Under Permanent Pressure and the Compensatory Role of External Accountability: A Comparative Study of Independent Police Complaints Bodies. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 19(2), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-025-00649-8
Akkas, S. A. (2023). Mechanisms for Judicial Accountability in the Contemporary World: Whither {Bangladesh}? In The Constitutional Law of Bangladesh (pp. 157–172). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2579-7_9
Albrecht, J. F. (2024). Understanding and Preventing Police Deviance and Corruption Based on Experiences and Trends in the United States. In Special Topics in Policing: Critical Issues and Global Perspectives (pp. 63–86). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56347-8_4
Alhamoudi, A. (2025). The Role of Criminal Justice in Facilitating Sustainable Development. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 10(2), 836–862. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v10i2.941
Arriagada, I., Farías, J., & Walker, A. (2021). Penal Population Trends in Chile from 1991 to 2007: An Empirical Approach to the Effects of the Chilean Criminal Procedure Reform. Política Criminal, 16(31), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992021000100062
Ashilsyah, M. A., Nuriyatman, E., Rodiyah, R., & Wedhatami, B. (2024). Can Reforming Dismissal Procedures in State Administrative Courts Enhance Transparency and Accountability? Indonesian State Law Review, 7(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v7i1.18862
Bersier, N., Bezemek, C., & Schauer, F. (2022). Introduction. In Law and Philosophy Library (Vol. 139, pp. 1–3). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87718-7_1
Billis, E. (2017). On the Methodology of Comparative Criminal Law Research. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24(6), 864–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X17745795
Bridge, M. (2017). Debt Instead of Damages in the Common Law. In Chinese Contract Law: Civil and Common Law Perspectives (pp. 423–444). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316816912.018
Dawson, M., & Bobić, A. (2025). Unpacking Legal Accountability: The Case of the European Central Bank. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8907. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8907
Dieng, A. (2024). Ensuring Criminal Accountability. In Empowering the {UN} Security Council (pp. 55–69). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197780602.003.0005
Ferrarese, M. R. (2017). An Entrepreneurial Conception of the Law? The American Model Through Italian Eyes. In Comparing Legal Cultures (pp. 157–181). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259741-18
Fierro, A. E. (2019). Amparo and Administrative Trials as Accountability Mechanisms in Mexico. In Rebuilding the State Institutions (pp. 141–154). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31314-2_8
Gunn, J., & Mevis, P. (2018). Adversarial Versus Inquisitorial Systems of Trial and Investigation in Criminal Procedure. In Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology in Europe (pp. 3–17). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74664-7_1
Heffernan, W. C. (2024). Social Justice/Criminal Justice: Race and Class in the Administration of Criminal Law. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75397-8
Jhaveri, S. (2021). What’s So Common About {Common Law} Approaches to Judicial Review? In Judicial Review of Administrative Action Across the Common Law World (pp. 3–24). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674355.002
Johnston, E., & Marsh, S. (2022). Contemporary Issues in Global Criminal Justice. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781666989212
Kasper, E. T. (2018). Administrative and Judicial Due Process. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 159–166). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_1030
Laputigar, R., Suhadi, S., & Rodiyah, R. (2024). Integrating Due Process into the Enforcement Framework of Criminal Law Politics. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 9(1), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v9i1.50293
Lavrysen, L., & Mavronicola, N. (2020). Coercive Human Rights: Positive Duties to Mobilise the Criminal Law Under the {ECHR}. Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509937905
Malby, S. (2025a). Beyond Sword and Shield: The {UN} Human Rights System and Criminal Law. International Journal of Human Rights, 29(5), 916–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2432953
Malby, S. (2025b). Public Wrongs and Human Rights: An Orderly Approach? Criminal Law and Philosophy, 19(2), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-024-09746-3
Massalimkyzy, M. (2018). The Problem of Correlation Between the Criminal Policy Humanization and the Concept of Justice at Imposing Criminal Penalties in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(1), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.1(31).19
Matvieieva, L., Dorofeieva, L., Burdin, M., Durnov, Y., & Dei, M. (2022). Legal Process in the National Legal Doctrine of Ukraine Through the Scope of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(2), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.411
Mugari, I., & Obioha, E. E. (2018). Patterns, Costs, and Implications of Police Abuse to Citizens’ Rights in the Republic of Zimbabwe. Social Sciences, 7(7), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7070116
Mugari, I., & Obioha, E. E. (2022). Curtailing Police Discretionary Powers: Civil Action Against the Police in Zimbabwe. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2075132. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2075132
Pistor, K. (2022). The Right to Effective Self-Government. In Constitutionalism and a Right to Effective Government (pp. 60–70). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009158541.005
Postema, G. J. (2020). Trust, Distrust and the Rule of Law. In Fiduciaries and Trust (pp. 242–272). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616225.016
Putrijanti, A., & Leonard, L. T. (2019). The Competence of Administrative Court to Examine the Abuse of Power. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i1.605
Roberts, J. V, & Petzsche, A. (2025). Sentencing Procedures Under the Adversarial and Inquisitorial Models of Justice: A Comparative Analysis. Criminal Law Forum, 36(2), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-025-09506-5
Rossi, M. (2023). The Karst Phenomena of Law in Action. In Contributions to Economics (pp. 159–172). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38708-1_8
Tornado, A. S. (2022). Evaluating the Convergence in International Human Rights and Criminal Procedures Law: An Indonesian Case Study. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 17(2), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756128
Zanetti, V. (2020). Proportionality and Compromises. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 17(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20182843
Zedner, L., & Stuckenberg, C.-F. (2019). Due Process. In Core Concepts in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (pp. 304–342). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649742.009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Civil Criminal Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
