The Effectiveness of Public Services of The Sorong City Education Office to The Community in Sorong City

Authors

  • Elvira Isir Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
  • Karmanis Karmanis Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
  • Tri Lestari Hadiati Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70062/ljrj.v2i1.132

Keywords:

Apparatus Responsiveness, Community Satisfaction, Education Services, Public Service Effectiveness;, Service Accountability

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the public services of the Sorong City Education Office for the community by examining the relationships among service effectiveness, community satisfaction, service accountability, and apparatus responsiveness. The research uses a mixed-methods approach: a quantitative component involving distributing questionnaires to 30 respondents, analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation, and a qualitative component involving in-depth interviews with five main sources, analyzed using triangulation and thematic analysis. The results of the study show that the effectiveness of public services is in the good category, with a significant relationship between service effectiveness and community satisfaction, service accountability, and responsiveness of the apparatus. Apparatus responsiveness has the strongest relationship with service effectiveness, showing the importance of officer responsiveness in improving the quality of education services. The interview findings also show that education services have improved, though further progress is needed in service speed and information transparency. The study's findings confirm the relevance of public administration theory and service quality in explaining the performance of regional education services. The research is limited in the small number of respondents and its focus on a single agency. Therefore, further research is recommended to increase the sample size, involve several public service agencies, and use a more comprehensive analytical model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus, A. (2015). Public service management. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Bungin, B. (2017). Social research methodology. Jakarta: Kencana.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315699356

Dwiyanto, A. (2016). Realizing good governance through public services. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Multivariate analysis application with the IBM SPSS program. Semarang: Publishing Agency of Diponegoro University.

Hardiyansyah. (2018). Quality of public services. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Hidayat, S. (2018). Public service management in the education sector. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Indiana, D. (2017). Public policy based on dynamic policy analysis. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Keban, Y. T. (2014). Six strategic dimensions of public administration. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.

Mahmudi. (2015). Public sector performance management. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Qualitative research methodology. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ndraha, T. (2015). Kybernology: The science of the new government. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.

Pasolong, H. (2017). Theory of public administration. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Riduwan. (2015). Measurement scale of research variables. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.

Serendipity. (2017). Public administration reform. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Sinambela, L. P. (2019). Public service reform. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryani, T. (2017). Consumer behavior in the Internet era. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Tjiptono, F. (2017). Service management: Realizing excellent service. Yogyakarta: No.

Umar, H. (2014). Research methods for a business thesis. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Widodo, J. (2016). Public policy analysis. Malang: Bayumedia.

Yamit, Z. (2016). Product and service quality management. Yogyakarta: Econsia.

Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2018). Marketing Services (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Elvira Isir, Karmanis Karmanis, & Tri Lestari Hadiati. (2026). The Effectiveness of Public Services of The Sorong City Education Office to The Community in Sorong City. Law and Justice Research Journal, 2(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.70062/ljrj.v2i1.132

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.