The Role of the Prosecutor as Dominus Litis in Assertive and Humanistic Law Enforcement

Authors

  • Nugrah Gables Manery Universitas Pattimura
  • Rocky S Mantaiborbir Universitas Pattimura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70062/ljrj.v1i2.88

Keywords:

Criminal Justice, Dominus Litis, Law Enforcement, Legal System, Prosecution, The Role of the Prosecutor

Abstract

Law enforcement holds a central role in shaping social order and ensuring the effective implementation of legal functions in Indonesia. The law is not merely a normative reference but must be strategically positioned as the fundamental basis for resolving disputes and conflicts that emerge within society. In this regard, Law No. 16 of 2004 concerning the Indonesian Prosecutor’s Office, particularly Article 2 paragraph (1), clearly stipulates that the Prosecutor’s Office is a state institution entrusted with exercising governmental authority in the field of prosecution, along with other responsibilities mandated by law. Within the framework of criminal justice, the Prosecutor’s Office assumes a pivotal role as Dominus Litis—the ultimate controller of criminal cases. This authority signifies that the Prosecutor’s Office is the only institution empowered to decide whether a particular case, supported by sufficient evidence in line with the Criminal Procedure Code, is eligible to be brought before the court. The prosecutor’s discretionary power in this context highlights its critical position in upholding justice and maintaining the integrity of legal proceedings. Beyond its prosecutorial function, the Prosecutor’s Office also bears the exclusive responsibility for executing criminal judgments, ensuring that court decisions are implemented properly and consistently with the rule of law. This dual function—both as Dominus Litis and executor of judicial decisions—underlines the institutional indispensability of the Prosecutor’s Office in the Indonesian legal system. The institution’s authority is therefore not limited to initiating prosecutions but also extends to safeguarding the finality and enforcement of criminal verdicts, which makes it a cornerstone in the broader architecture of law enforcement. Consequently, strengthening the role and capacity of the Prosecutor’s Office is essential for advancing justice, protecting the rights of citizens, and reinforcing the legitimacy of Indonesia’s legal order.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andi, M. S., & Asis, A. (2014). Criminal procedure law: An introduction (2nd ed.). Jakarta, Indonesia: Kencana.

Ardilafiza. (2016). Independence of the prosecutor's office as the executor of prosecutorial power in the Indonesian constitutional system. Constitutional Journal, 3(2).

Cowdery, N. (2016). Prosecutorial independence in Australia: How much independence and how much accountability? Criminal Law Journal, 40(4), 197–214.

Effendy, M. (2012). Discretion in the enforcement of criminal acts of corruption. Paper presented at the National Seminar, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia.

Field, S., & Davies, C. (2012). Human rights, victims and the prosecution of crime in the UK. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 40(4), 248–262.

Frase, R. (1980). The decision to file federal criminal charges: A quantitative study of prosecutorial discretion. University of Chicago Law Review, 47(2), 246–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/1599360

Hamza, A. (2017). Criminal procedure law (2nd ed.). Jakarta, Indonesia: Sinar Grafika.

Irwansyah. (2021). Legal research: Choices of methods and practices in article writing (Rev. ed.). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Mirra Buana Media.

Peay, G. L. (2021). Prosecutorial discretion and accountability. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.

Republic of Indonesia. (1981). Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Republic of Indonesia. (2004). Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia.

Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 about the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia.

Roach, K. (1999). Four models of the criminal process. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 89(2), 671–716. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144140

Sprack, J. (2021). A practical approach to criminal procedure (19th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Timur, A. (2021). Proceedings series of Cepalo Journal. Master’s Degree in Law, University of Lampung.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2014). The status and role of prosecutors: A United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime handbook. Vienna, Austria: United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Nugrah Gables Manery, & Rocky S Mantaiborbir. (2025). The Role of the Prosecutor as Dominus Litis in Assertive and Humanistic Law Enforcement. Law and Justice Research Journal, 1(2), 01–05. https://doi.org/10.70062/ljrj.v1i2.88

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.