Amnesty : A Review of the Principles of Justice in Law no. 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Amnesty

Authors

  • Elis Kayanti
  • Lydia Natalia Amul
  • Rosa Amalia Fitriani

Keywords:

Tax Forgiveness, Taxpayers, Principles of Justice

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out how the regulations regarding tax amnesty in Indonesia are based on Law no. 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Forgiveness and to find out how to implement Tax Forgiveness in Indonesia so that it meets the Principles of Justice. The research method used is normative legal research. The research results obtained regarding the fulfillment of the principles of justice in the implementation of tax amnesty in Indonesia based on Law no. 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Amnesty, namely that it has fulfilled the principle of justice, seen from the number of tax payments received and the number of taxpayers who comply to report their taxes. The increase in taxpayers who comply through the implementation of tax amnesty will also increase taxpayers reporting and correcting notification letters regarding their assets as well as taxpayer awareness of tax amnesty which has an important role in increasing taxpayer compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggara, Sahya. (2016). Tax Administration Law. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

CPC. (2019). Evidence of Predicate Crimes Related to the Crime of Money Laundering (TPPU) in Corruption Crime Cases in Indonesia. Implementing JDIH BPK Representative of Central Java Province. Retrieved from https://jateng.bpk.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/TH-pencucian-uang.pdf

Dungga, Weny Almoravid, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, & Gorontalo State University. (2024). The Assessment of Indonesia's Religious Courts in Resolving Shari'ah Banking Disputes According to the Principles of Justice. MJTILP Issue 3. Available from https://example.com

Ibrahim, Johnny. (2008). Normative Legal Research Theory and Methodology. Malang: Bayumedia.

INDONESIA, CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC. (2016). Copy of Decision Number 63/PUU-XIV/2016. JDHI Ministry of Finance.

Johan Nasution, Bahder. (2014). Philosophical Study of the Concept of Justice from Classical Thought to Modern Thought. Justisia Law Journal, 3(2), 118-130.

Khairunnisa, Priska, & Tundjung Herning Sitabuana. (2022). Corruption Actions of Persons at the Directorate General of Taxes Influence Taxpayers' Perceptions of Tax Collection. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Scientific Journal for the Social, Economic, Cultural, Technological and Educational Sectors, 1(7), 1179-1194.

Kurniawati, Lestari. (2017). Tax Amnesty Efforts to Strengthen Tax Sector State Revenue. Substance, 1(2), 238-264. Retrieved from http://www.jurnalfe.ustjogja.ac.id

Maulana, Iqbal, & Imahda Khoiri Furqon. (2021). Analysis of Tax Amnesty as an Effort to Strengthen State Revenue in the Tax Sector. Balanca, 3(1), 27-40.

Rawls, John. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press Of Harvard University Press.

Wantu, Fence M. (2012). Realizing Legal Certainty, Justice and Benefits in Judges' Decisions in Civil Courts. Journal of Legal Dynamics, 12(3), 484.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-17

How to Cite

Elis Kayanti, Lydia Natalia Amul, & Rosa Amalia Fitriani. (2024). Amnesty : A Review of the Principles of Justice in Law no. 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Amnesty. Research Journal of International Law Theory and Practice, 1(3), 01–10. Retrieved from https://law.ifrel.org/index.php/RJILTP/article/view/16