Effectiveness of Detention by Public Prosecutors Against Perpetrators of Criminal Acts

Authors

  • Agus Salim Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
  • Achmad Faishal Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
  • Suprapto Suprapto Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70062/ljrj.v2i1.120

Keywords:

Criminal Justice System, Detention, Effectiveness, Human Rights, Public Prosecutor

Abstract

Detention is one of the most coercive measures in the criminal justice process and is intended to ensure the effectiveness of criminal proceedings. In many legal systems, public prosecutors are granted authority to order detention against suspects or defendants under specific legal requirements. However, the practical effectiveness of detention by public prosecutors in achieving procedural objectives and safeguarding legal rights remains a subject of debate. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of detention carried out by public prosecutors against perpetrators of criminal acts, focusing on its legal basis, implementation, and impact on the criminal justice process. Using a normative juridical approach supported by qualitative analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and relevant case studies, this research evaluates whether prosecutorial detention fulfills principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, and human rights protection. The findings indicate that while detention by public prosecutors can enhance procedural efficiency and prevent obstruction of justice, its effectiveness is often constrained by inconsistencies in application, weak judicial oversight, and potential risks of arbitrary detention. This study concludes that strengthening legal safeguards, standardizing detention criteria, and enhancing accountability mechanisms are essential to ensure that detention by public prosecutors remains both effective and compliant with the rule of law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, R. (2020). Due process of law and pretrial detention in Indonesia: A human rights perspective. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 5(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i2.38192

Cape, E., Hodgson, J., Prakken, T., & Spronken, T. (2010). Suspects in Europe: Procedural rights at the investigative stage of the criminal process. Intersentia.

Fauzi, A. (2021). Reorientasi fungsi penuntut umum dalam penegakan hukum pidana berbasis keadilan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 10(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.1.2021.45-62

Handayani, T. (2020). Urgensi pengaturan penahanan dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia untuk mewujudkan kepastian hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 14(2), 315–334. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.V14.315-334

Harahap, R., & Saputra, A. (2022). Efektivitas pengawasan fungsional terhadap diskresi jaksa dalam penahanan tersangka. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(3), 289–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.289-302

Hidayat, A. S. (2019). The limits of praperadilan in reviewing detention decisions in Indonesia. Yuridika, 34(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v34i3.15632

Kusuma, M. W. (2022). Analisis diskresi jaksa penuntut umum dalam penahanan tersangka pada tahap penuntutan. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(5), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i5.212

Lestari, S. (2021). Prosecutorial power and judicial oversight in Indonesian criminal justice reform. Jurnal Media Hukum, 28(2), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v28i2.11987

Lubis, M. S. (2021). Implementasi hak asasi manusia dalam penahanan pada proses penyidikan menurut KUHAP. Jurnal Hukum Replik, 9(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v9i1.4245

Marzuki, I., & Rahman, F. (2020). Perlindungan hak konstitusional tersangka dalam masa penahanan pra-ajudikasi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(4), 780–802. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1744

Nasution, A. B. (2022). Pretrial detention and the presumption of innocence in Indonesia. Padjadjaran Journal of Law, 9(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n1.a5

Prasetyo, B. (2023). Prinsip proporsionalitas dalam penerapan upaya paksa penahanan pada sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 11(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v11i1.65210

Pratama, R. Y., & Yulianto, A. (2021). Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan literatur. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 8(2), 145–156.

Sihombing, E. N. (2019). Kedudukan dan wewenang penuntut umum dalam melakukan penahanan menurut hukum acara pidana. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah, 18(2), 145–159.

Sudarsono, A. (2021). Pengawasan yudisial terhadap penahanan pre-trial dalam kerangka due process of law. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(2), 412–425.

United Nations Human Rights Committee. (2014). General comment No. 35: Article 9 (Liberty and security of person). United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org

Wiranata, I. G. (2021). Pragmatisme hukum dalam keputusan penahanan oleh jaksa penuntut umum: Sebuah tinjauan sosio-legal. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(3), 321–335.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Agus Salim, Achmad Faishal, & Suprapto Suprapto. (2026). Effectiveness of Detention by Public Prosecutors Against Perpetrators of Criminal Acts. Law and Justice Research Journal, 2(1), 01–06. https://doi.org/10.70062/ljrj.v2i1.120

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.