The Impact of International Human Rights Law on National Judicial Systems : A Comparative Analysis
Keywords:
International human rights law, national judicial systems, comparative analysis, legal integration, human rights normsAbstract
This study examines the impact of international human rights law on national judicial systems through a comparative analysis. The research aims to explore how international human rights norms influence domestic court decisions and the extent to which national judicial systems incorporate these norms into their legal frameworks. Using a qualitative comparative approach, this study analyzes judicial decisions from multiple countries with varying legal traditions. The findings reveal significant differences in the reception and application of international human rights law, influenced by historical, cultural, and political contexts. The study concludes that while some judicial systems demonstrate a strong commitment to integrating international human rights norms, others show resistance due to sovereignty concerns or differing legal philosophies. These findings highlight the complex relationship between international human rights law and national judicial practices, offering insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and human rights advocates to enhance the effectiveness of human rights protections globally.
Downloads
References
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
East South Institute. (2023). Effectiveness of International Human Rights Mechanisms in Protecting Civil and Political Rights. East and South Law and Human Rights Journal.
Farooq, U. (2022). International Human Rights Treaties and Domestic Legal Systems: A Comparative Perspective. Federal Law Journal of Pakistan.
Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Helfer, L. R., & Slaughter, A. M. (1997). Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication. Yale Law Journal, 107(2), 273-391.
Keller, H., & Stone Sweet, A. (2008). Assessing the Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on National Legal Systems. Yale Law School.
Merry, S. E. (2006). Legal Pluralism and Human Rights: Challenges and Opportunities for Human Rights Practice. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 38(52), 1-25.
Merry, S. E. (2006). Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 38-51.
Roberts, A. (2017). Comparative International Law: The Role of National Courts in International Human Rights Law Development. Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage Publications.
Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Semantic Scholar.
Sloss, D. (2014). Domestic Application of International Law: Judicial Incorporation and Interpretation. American Journal of International Law, 108(3), 493-549.
Sloss, D. (2014). Why Do National Court Judges Refer to Human Rights Treaties? A Comparative International Law Analysis of CEDAW. American Journal of International Law. Cambridge University Press.
Van der Wilt, H. (2011). Implementation of International Law in National Legal Systems: Lessons from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9(2), 463-479.
Waters, M. A. (2007). Creeping Monism: The Judicial Trend Toward Interpretive Incorporation of Human Rights Treaties. Columbia Law Review, 107(3), 628-705.
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Monism and Dualism in International Law. Retrieved from [Link].
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
