Legal Perspectives on State Responsibility in Transboundary Environmental Pollution
Keywords:
Environmental law, state responsibility, transboundary pollution, international liability, legal frameworkAbstract
Transboundary environmental pollution poses significant challenges in international law, particularly regarding state responsibility. This study examines the legal frameworks governing state liability for environmental damage that extends beyond national borders. The research explores key principles such as the "no harm" rule, due diligence obligations, and international liability mechanisms. Using a doctrinal legal research method, this paper analyzes landmark cases and international agreements, including the Trail Smelter Arbitration and the Paris Agreement. The findings highlight gaps in enforcement and the need for stronger compliance measures. This study contributes to the discourse on environmental governance by proposing legal strategies to enhance state accountability and cooperation in mitigating transboundary pollution.
Downloads
References
Birnie, P., Boyle, A., & Redgwell, C. (2021). International law and the environment (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bodansky, D. (2020). The art and craft of international environmental law. Harvard University Press.
Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., & Rajamani, L. (2017). International climate change law. Oxford University Press.
Boer, B. (2020). Environmental principles and the law: Principles for decision making in the courts. Routledge.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Glenn, H. P. (2020). Legal traditions of the world (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Hunter, D., Salzman, J., & Zaelke, D. (2015). International environmental law and policy (5th ed.). Foundation Press.
Knox, J. H. (2021). The implications of human rights for environmental protection. American Journal of International Law, 115(1), 90-113. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2021.5
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Rajamani, L. (2016). The Paris Agreement: Interplay between hard, soft, and non-obligations. Journal of Environmental Law, 28(2), 337-358. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw015
Richardson, B. J. (2019). Time and environmental law: Telling nature’s time. Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, B. J., & Wood, S. (2020). Environmental law for sustainability: Critical issues and debates. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sands, P., & Peel, J. (2018). Principles of international environmental law (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
Schrijver, N. (2019). State responsibility for environmental harm under international law. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 50, 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-019-09232-7
Silverman, D. (2020). Interpreting qualitative data (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
